Monday, 16 July 2018

Ramshackle Wazirabad Yamuna bridge - a disaster in waiting


Ramshackle Wazirabad Yamuna 
bridge  ̶  a disaster in waiting

By Mukesh Sharma

NEW DELHI: The Wazirabad Yamuna Bridge in North-East Delhi which is over 70 years old, is the only bridge connecting North-East Delhi, and besides local traffic all the vehicles from Loni, Ghaziabad use this bridge to enter inner parts of Delhi, and today it stands in dilapidated condition. However, thousands of vehicles crawls through this neglected bridge daily, and perhaps the authorities are waiting for some disaster to happen.
Nearly three months ago, the bridge was closed for busses and trucks to ‘repair’ the so called cycle track, nearly 8 ft. wide abutting the bridge. In fact, it was just a footpath and meant for pedestrians. The vested interests changed the nomenclature and renamed it ‘cycle track’. The restoration work is yet to be completed. The shoddy manner the work is being done rises doubts in the mind of the commoner that the contractor and officials concerned have made a fortune. It is open secret that based on public complaints and notings of the top officials, the tender for restoration work is floated; it is awarded to the ‘right’ contractor; work is completed; the calculated and well bargained cut reaches the share holders and the file is wrapped up with  hip hip hurray . . . and three cheers.
                                             
                                             Waterlogged Yamuna Bridge
On last Friday, the heavy rain led to water logging on the bridge. The vehicles were wading through knee deep water. The drain pipe put up by the contractor were chocked with dirt and mortar. Nobody bothered to open it. Moreover, the road over the bridge is full of potholes. The vehicular movement of this rugged bridge is so slow that a long line of bumper to bumper traffic jam can be witnessed from both sides of the bridge  round the clock. Hats off to Delhi Police cops who try to regulate the traffic but in vain. In fact, the authorities concerned should have first mended the road over the bridge for the smooth flow of traffic. But who cares! Enjoying fat salaries with no accountability, the officials who act like demi-gods, take little interest in public work on ground zero  except in file.
Interestingly enough, all the drivers of passing vehicles while moving like a bullock-cart do look at the much-touted Signature Bridge just 100 meters away. The people do dream of the auspicious day when the bridge would be completed and thrown open to public and the people would get rid of this daily tussle of traffic jam. But the next moment, they curse the netas. . . and get going.
The signature bridge was conceived by the respected netas about 14 years ago with a budget of just Rs 700 crores. The work dragged on for years for one or other reasons. The budget continued to be enhanced years after years for the reasons best known to netas only. And now it is said to have crossed  a whooping sum for Rs 1500 crores, and still it is under construction. To raise the hope of people, every year ‘netas’ give a deadline for its completion, but it turns out to be as hollow as their election promises.
Fearing the worst, disgruntle people content that the authorities would wake up after some untoward incident. God forbids, if this Wazirabad bridge collapses, the netas would visit in hordes; inquiry would be instituted; next of kins would be given some solatium; some overactive NGOs would stage candle light protests and some enthusiasts would raise a memorial and lit the candle every year on the day of disaster. But no lesson would be learnt. In all the cases, as usual, it is people who have to pay the price, and remain at receiving end.   
#DTTDC #Delhi #Government #Signaturebridge #Yamuna #Waziabad #AAP#BJP #congress #timescityreporter

Wednesday, 14 February 2018

History of English Language

It is a historical fact that the Britisher who rules over India for long 200 years, had themselves spent 400 years of slavery under much celebrated and civilized then Roman Empire.

There was time when the Roman were very powerful. They had colonized most of the west. They would look upon themselves as God destined to rule.

The historical records trace the founding of the Roman Republic to 509 BC. It was established, as a Roman empire, in 27 BC, and continued to prosper and perpetuate from first emperor Augustus (Caesar Augustus) through the last emperor Ramulus Augustulas (475-476 BC) till the final eclipse of the empire of the west in 5th century AD.

The slavery was quite common in those days. The defeated races were always subjected to slavery. The blockbuster English movie Gladiator aptly portrays the age — the glory the Roman, and their menial and minion subject. The Roman enslaved several races and the Britisher were also one of them. The scholars maintain that the Britisher remain in servitude as long as for 400 years in Roman empire.

Quoting the words of a Roman senator about the British “barbarians”, in 1784, William Pitt made a memorable slavery in them British parliament, and said :

There is a people that will never rise to civilization; there is a people destined never to be free; a people without the understanding of useful arts; depressed the hand of nature below the level of the human species; and created to form a supply of slaves”

Undoubtedly, it was sheer luck that made the Britisher the unchallenged sovereigns of a great part of India, and to control and use the country of millions like personal estates. Endorsing the fact, Jawaharlal Nehru, in his widely acclaimed book Discovery of India, says :

“She has always honoured thought and men of thought, the highbrows, and has refused to consider the men of the sword or the possessor of money as superior to them.’

True, the Britisher were not a superior race. It was Germanic people — Angles and Saxons along with another nomadic hand Jutes who together invaded then Britain and dispossessed the Romanised Celt of Britain. They colonized the people and took under control that mass land in 4 AD.



Interestingly enough, Angles gave their names to that seized land as Angla-land that later became England. Revealing the fact Britannica Encylopedia (17th Ed, 1997 vol 1 P 406) says :

“The Angles gave their name to England, as well as to the word, ‘Englisc; used even by saxon writers to denote their vernacular tongue”

Then the British anointed by the phrase like the great Britains, in a mixed hybrid race of Roman and Germanic nomads with no roots .

Even English language can’t be credited to the Britishers. The original native speaker of English were Angles and Saxon, the Germanic people. Infact , the Britishers used to speak the Celtic — the language of so called slave in Roman Empire and the official language of Roman was Latin.